Do Idly and Rajma really have a high biodiversity footprint?

V. Ramanatha Rao, C.L. Laxmipathi Gowda, S.V. Raghuram Shetty, M.J. Vasudeva Rao, D.R. Mohan Raj

Given greater awareness of environmental degradation, research in recent years has focussed on how different facets of human activity contribute to climate change and/or biodiversity loss. In that context, some studies have attempted to analyse the biodiversity footprint of various agricultural products, with the aim of potentially reducing the consumption of food products with a high biodiversity footprint. (Note: Biodiversity footprint is a metric used to estimate biodiversity loss; a higher footprint would imply a greater loss of biodiversity.)

Economic Growth: A plea for equity and sustainability

GRSV Blog no. 11
V. Ramanatha Rao
Release date: 26-07-2022

        Economic growth/development means different things to different people. Among the numerous definitions, one that most appeals to me most considers economic growth as “an increase in the amount of goods and services produced per head of the population over a period of time.” The critical point here is that economic growth should increase people’s real income (i.e., people can buy goods and services at affordable cost and thus become less poor). However, economists usually measure economic growth in terms of gross domestic product (GDP) or related indicators, such as gross national product (GNP) or gross national income (GNI), or at best GDP per capita, as derived from the GDP calculation.

Is Natural Farming Ecologically Sustainable and Socio-economically Viable?

GRSV Blog no. 10
Release date: 04/03/2022
CL Laxmipathi Gowda, V Ramanatha Rao, SV Raghuram Shetty, and MJ Vasudeva Rao

Recently, interest in Natural Farming (NF) has surged, spearheaded by the Government of India (GOI).  The principles of natural farming are rooted in the concepts defined by Surapala’s Vrikshayurveda (1000 CE), the ancient Indian “science of plant life.” In fact, early agriculture anywhere on the globe could be called as natural farming.

Dr Neelam Patel, senior adviser, India’s NITI Aayog, has said that over 0.65 million hectares of agricultural land in 11 states in India is already under this form of natural farming (Indian Express, 27 January 2022). But the figure could be much higher, as most of the low-input agriculture by resource-poor smallholder farmers can be called “natural farming by default”. The GOI’s budget proposals also recommend the adoption of chemical-free NF along the 5 km-wide corridors of the Ganga river basin. Farmers who adopted NF in some states in India (such as Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Sikkim) have claimed higher yields and low cultivation costs; but the validation of those claims is still awaited, in terms of increases in larger-scale production, productivity, and economics, as well as in meeting the needs of environmental sustainability.

Further discussion on the Blog (# 8) “Smallholder farmers in India should have a say in pricing what they produce” by GRSV Experts – Economists

The GRSV Experts, especially the economists, further explored the idea of farmers having a say in determining the price of agricultural produce (see “Smallholder farmers in India should have a say in pricing what they produce” GRSV Blog no. 8 https://grsvconsulting.com/smallholder-farmers-in-india-should-have-a-say-in-pricing-what-they-produce/). Summary of these discussions are given below:

While farmers are a key to ending hunger and malnutrition worldwide, they are increasingly facing barriers to profitability, especially the smallholder farmers (SHF), who constitute the most vulnerable section. Some of the policy/institutions /institutional arrangements that directly or indirectly support farmers role in price formation that are presently in vogue are briefly described below.

Strengthening India-Africa Partnership in Agricultural Research and Development: Setting an Example for South-South Cooperation in Sustainable Development

GRSV Blog no. 9
Release date: 25/06/2021
SV Raghuram Shetty, Paul Senghor, MVK Sivakumar, Sanath K Reddy, CL Laxmipathi Gowda, V Ramanatha Rao, MJ Vasudeva Rao, and Said Silim

The UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 17 specifically addresses the need for global partnerships which utilize and share knowledge, expertise, technology, and resources to support the achievement of the other 16 SDGs, especially in developing countries (https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/). In the past, international cooperation in development focused heavily on multilateral collaboration, involving multilateral institutions and developed and developing countries. Recently, however, there has been increasing emphasis on enhancing South-South cooperation in access to science, technology, and innovation, and to enhance knowledge sharing on mutually agreed terms. South-South cooperation, especially in effective and targeted capacity building and institutional development in the least developed countries, has been given high priority, which calls for more innovative partnerships, with the engagement of both the public and the private sector. We focus here on such collaboration in agricultural research and development between India and Africa.

Smallholder farmers in India should have a say in pricing what they produce

GRSV Blog no. 8
Release date: 22/04/2021
V. Ramanatha Rao, C.L. Laxmipathi Gowda, S.V.R. Shetty, and M.J. Vasudeva Rao,
Co-founders, Global Research for Development Support Ventures

While smallholder farmers (SHF, defined as owning less that 2 ha of land) constitute a large segment (86%) of the farming community in India, at present they have a negligible role, if at all, in deciding the price of what they produce. In our view, they should be enabled to play a more active role. We present a brief picture of the scenario as it exists, in order to justify our view.

Will the Agricultural Reforms of 2020 lead to a better future for the Indian farmer?

GRSV Blog No. 7,
Released on 16/11/2020,
Agriculture Market Reforms in India have been under consideration for a long time, with a view to make the agriculture marketing system more competitive. As early as 2003, a model marketing act was enacted, which was further amended in 2017. The model act provided for markets to be set up by private sector players, besides the existing Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC). In addition, farmers were free to sell produce by their choice, strengthening their bargaining power through the formation of Farmer Associations and Farmer-Producer Organisations (FPOs), bulk marketing, contract farming, pledge financing, and by instituting a system of negotiable warehouse receipts, etc. In 2016, another landmark was achieved when the electronic national agriculture market (e-NAM) was launched.

Will Secondary Agriculture be the Game Changer for Doubling Smallholder Farmers’ income?

GRSV Blog No. 6,
Released on 20/09/2020,
Over the last few years, there has been considerable discussion in India on doubling farmers’ income. The current Central Government has launched a program for “Doubling Farmers’ Income” to be achieved by 2022, and it has set up a Task Force headed by a senior IAS officer. Farmers’ income can be increased, theoretically speaking, by either (i) doubling the yield, or (ii) doubling the market price for the farm produce. In addition, other measures would be needed to attain this goal, which would include resource-use efficiency and reduced cost of production, intensive farming, use of Internet of Things (IoT), crop diversification, the “real” price received by farmers, etc. In this context, ‘Secondary Agriculture’ and allied activities can help to enhance farmers’ incomes. The time set for achieving the target, 2022, appears to be a stiff one, especially in the rainfed and other dry land areas, as only two years remain.